An agreement and satisfaction is an agreement in which a party to a pre-existing contract agrees to a lesser form of compensation to settle a claim. In this case, the initial contract is the agreement and the compensation is satisfaction. This type of agreement is usually entered into when one of the parties to the agreement who has a claim believes that it may not receive full compensation at the desired time. The agreement allows the contracting parties to settle claims in a timely manner. The system can be abused and can allow asset debtors to take advantage of their creditors who have fallen into difficult times. From a technical point of view, “agreement” means that the parties agree to exchange or replace one duty or obligation with another, and “satisfaction” means that the party is released from its duty when it “fulfills” or fulfills its obligation. Agreement and satisfaction can be used as a form of compromise that benefits both parties when the original terms of a contract cannot be maintained for any reason. When agreement and satisfaction are reached for debt relief, the creditor always receives part of the debt payment, while the debtor benefits from not being bound by the full obligation. It should be noted that agreement and satisfaction may result from an express agreement between the parties, but may also be implied on the basis of the circumstances. The term “agreement and satisfaction” refers to the time when the parties agree to release each other from legal liability, contract or claim for the performance of another obligation. The agreement is the agreement on the new contractual conditions, and the execution is the fulfillment of these conditions in accordance with the agreement. If there is agreement and satisfaction and the service (or satisfaction) has been performed, all previous claims relating to the matter will lapse.

If, for any reason, Company A does not meet the new conditions, it may be held liable for the original contract because it did not comply with the terms of the agreement. An agreement and performance do not replace the original contract; Rather, it suspends the applicability of this Agreement, provided that the terms of the Agreement are complied with as agreed. In other words, what is enforceable is the legal obligation that results from the agreement and satisfaction, not the legal obligation that has been “modified” or “alternated”. And, of course, the ubiquitous “full payment” written on installment checks is a constant source of contention as creditors and debtors argue over whether an agreement and satisfaction has been reached. The law of the respective state regulates these matters (often the UCC, if it is a merchant), and the notified creditor or debtor will learn the respective law before issuing or cashing such a check. For example, if a party fulfills a contractual obligation to fulfill the terms of the contract, it means that the person`s obligation has been successfully fulfilled and therefore legally fulfilled. The party who argues that an obligation has alternated and has been fulfilled, or that there has been full satisfaction and agreement, shall bear the burden of proof before the court. For example, suppose Bob owes Sally $600 under contract. Bob offers to give Sally an old car from him instead of the $600.

If Sally accepts the vehicle as compensation for the money originally owed, she waives her right to the money and is now entitled to the vehicle promised by Bob. The legal term “Agreement” refers to the new agreement between Bob and Sally. Previously, the courts had only reached an agreement and a satisfaction agreement if there was no disagreement on the amount of the dispute. In all other cases, disputes had to be settled through a compromise and a settlement agreement. Currently, however, an agreement and a satisfaction agreement include all compromises regarding the amount at stake in the dispute. In its current form, an agreement and satisfaction allow for a complete revision of the initial agreement between the parties concerned. However, such an agreement is never intended to replace the original contract; On the contrary, it prevents the application of the Treaty as long as the terms of the agreement are respected as negotiated. An agreement and satisfaction often gives one of the parties the opportunity to make smaller, more frequent payments at a lower interest rate. However, any breach of the agreement will certainly result in a lawsuit that revolves around the original contract.

For example, if the parties agree to fulfill an obligation at the time another obligation is fulfilled, call it an agreement. A satisfaction agreement and agreement can help resolve disputes that would otherwise require legal litigation. As with other contracts, an agreement and satisfaction must include all the elements of a contract. second, in accordance with the U.S. C.C§ 3-311(b), the claim is released, unless otherwise provided, if the person against whom the claim is invoked proves that the act or the accompanying written notice contained a visible statement that the deed was offered in full satisfaction of the claim. Just because an agreement is reached does not mean that the original contract is not rejected. The original contract still applies, but it is suspended on the understanding that the Treaty of Understanding fulfils its conditions. If the Agreement is complied with, this Agreement and the original Contract shall be deemed to have been complied with. In this example, there is agreement and satisfaction that Mary`s commitment to pay $5,000 next month will replace the $1,000 payment over the next five months. The agreement must be concluded on a new agreement. It must therefore have the essential conditions of a contract (parties, object, period of performance and consideration). If there is a violation of the agreement, there will be no “satisfaction” that will lead to a violation of the agreement.

In this case, the non-infringing party has the right to take legal action under the original contract or agreement. In an agreement contract, it is typical that the consideration paid is lower than that negotiated in the original contract. In accordance with contracts that require a lower amount of consideration than the original amount, the consideration must be of a different type. B for example, the debtor offers a car or boat instead of money. Agreement and enforcement is generally a matter of state law and is generally defined as an agreement to fulfill a claim, in which the parties undertake to provide and accept another service, which is generally less than what is required or due. Any claim based on an express or implied contract may be subject to agreement and performance. See our article on contracts. Since an agreement is considered to be a new agreement that replaces the old one, the agreement and performance must contain all the essential elements of a contract.

If the parties have an agreement and satisfaction to fulfill new obligations, once the new obligation is fulfilled, they will no longer be able to apply the previous agreement. You may have heard of a match and a satisfaction check or a complete match and satisfaction. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1521, an agreement to accept something different or inferior to that to which the person who agrees to accept is entitled. Code Cal Civ § 1522 states that since the parties to an agreement are obliged to effectively execute it, it only extinguishes the obligation when it is fully performed. .